Comparing and contrasting truth-themed novels is the focus of this lesson

Rate This:
2873 1
Thanks!
An error occurred!

Subject(s): Language Arts Grades(s): Junior High/High School

Title – A Question of Truth

By – Barbara A. Lord

Primary Subject – Language Arts

Grade Level – 9

Time: 6-9 weeks

Concept/Topic to Teach:

    This lesson teaches critical thinking through the comparison/contrast of the two novels,

    Nothing But the Truth

    by Avi and

    Monster

    by Walter Dean Myers.

Standards addressed:

    North Carolina Competency Goals 3 and 4

    Bloom’s Taxonomy

Specific Objectives:

  1. Learn vocabulary
  2. Read and comprehend the plots of the two novels
  3. Examine the two protagonists, Steve Harmon and Phillip Malloy and complete a Venn Diagram
  4. Evaluate the themes of the two novels
  5. Evaluate the authors’ styles of writing and
    the effect on theme
  6. Participate in a Paideia Seminar
  7. Write a persuasive essay

Required Materials:

  1. copies of the two novels
  2. graphic organizer for the Venn Diagram

Lead In:

    Open with a general discussion surrounding
    telling the truth. Ask students to relate
    personal experiences about times when they
    discovered that people were not truthful.
    Ask them if they have ever lied and what
    consequences they suffered.

Step-By-Step:

  • Begin with lead-in
  • Introduce

    Monster

    by asking students to relate
    what they know about the legal system
  • Introduce vocabulary
  • Read and discuss the novel in class. In
    particular, discuss Meyer’s style of presenting
    the story as Steve’s movie script.
  • Give study guide questions (Bloom’s knowledge and
    comprehension levels) to ensure understanding.
  • Discuss the ending. Is Steve guilty? Students
    should refer to the text for support.
  • Begin

    Nothing But the Truth

    by discussing school
    and teachers. What makes a good teacher?
  • Follow the same plan as Monster.
  • At the conclusion of the two novels, have students
    create a Venn Diagram comparing Steve and Phillip.
  • Discuss the author’s style of writing. Is it
    effective?
  • Conduct a Paideia Seminar asking the following
    questions: “What truth does Avi want the reader
    to get from the novel? Is the title ironic? Does
    Myers want the reader to discover the same truth
    as Avi? What is ‘truth’? Is there just one
    definition?”
  • Choose one of the following activities to end the
    unit:(a) Write a persuasive essay stating whether
    Steve or Phillip is guilty or innocent.
    (b) Write a play about truth. (c) Conduct a class
    trial to find either Steve or Phillip guilty or
    innocent.
  • Assessment may include vocabulary or comprehension
    quizzes. A rubric could be created to evaluate the
    essay, play or trial. Participation in the seminar
    could be evaluated.

E-Mail

Barbara A. Lord

!

Print Friendly
Rate:
2873 1
Thanks!
An error occurred!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To comment, click below to log in.

*